PennLaw, LLC

Criminal Defense Representation In State And Federal Courts

Free Initial Consultation
Butler: 724-602-4583
Pittsburgh: 412-342-8000
Review Us

SCOTUS: dog sniff of home equals police search, requires warrant

Back on March 6, we discussed a pair of cases before the U.S. Supreme Court that could have a big impact on police powers in Pittsburgh versus the Fourth Amendment's search warrant requirement to prevent random, unlimited government searches of people and their personal property. The cases were heard by the Court simultaneously because they both involved police in the same state using a police dog to search for drugs without a warrant.

One case involved a traffic stop and the other concerned police standing outside a residence. The Court ruled in favor of the police in the traffic stop case, but on March 26 the justices drew a distinction when it comes to dog sniffs of homes. In a 5-4 vote, the Court ruled that police must obtain a search warrant before using a police dog to search a home, even if the dog is standing outside the door.

An important principle in ruling is the curtilage of the home. The "curtilage" refers to the area immediately surrounding the walls of the home, such as a porch or surrounding sidewalk. The Court has traditionally held that the curtilage is part of the home for Fourth Amendment purposes. In the case before the Court, police received a tip that marijuana were possibly being grown inside a house. An officer took a police dog to the front door of the house and after several minutes the dog indicated that it smelled marijuana inside. Based on that dog sniff, the officers obtained a search warrant that led to an arrest.

Those in the majority made up a coalition of conservative and liberal justices. Writing for the majority, Justice Antonin Scalia said that the search warrant requirement would "be of little practical value" if police were able to detect what is going on inside a home without having to go inside. Also rejecting the warrantless dog sniff were justices Ginsburg, Kagen, Sotomayor and Thomas.

Source: USA TODAY, "High court rules against drug-sniffing dog search," David Jackson and Richard Wolf, March 26, 2013

ยท For more information about the laws regulating drug arrests, please visit our Pittsburgh drug charges page.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Arrested? Contact Us Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

106 South Main Street
Suite 801
Butler, PA 16001

Phone: 412-342-8000
Fax: 724-284-9402
Butler Law Office Map

100 Ross St.
Suite 340
Pittsburgh, PA 15219

Phone: 724-602-4583
Fax: 724-284-9402
Map & Directions